Cut to order: How Estonia’s Fractory built a cloud-based manufacturing platform

October 18, 2023

by Justin Petrone

Like so many great things, it all started with a beer in Tartu, Estonia’s frolicsome and freewheeling university town. Martin Vares, a mechanical engineer by trade, was responsible for designing and ensuring the production of natural gas filling stations but was spending too much of his time hounding manufacturers to see if they could produce his industrial and engineering solutions.

“I was spending 20 per cent of my time on emails and phone calls,” says Vares. Most companies in the industrial space don’t produce all the parts necessary for manufacturing themselves, he notes. Rather, the part manufacturing is outsourced to third parties with the correct, often expensive machinery. Vares would send out emails with his 2D drawings attached, inquiring about quotes and manufacturing lead times, only to have to call up to find out they were booked or didn’t have the capabilities.

This led him to commiserate with a friend over a beer. It was September 2016. Before the War in Ukraine heated up. Before the pandemic. Donald Trump hadn’t even been elected president. Vares told his friend that, as an engineer, he found it ridiculous that he was spending hours chasing manufacturers on the phone. The human transaction in the procurement process was slowing things down. Something had to be done. From that rant emerged a new company.

“We discussed it and came up with the idea of a marketplace platform,” says Vares.

They called it Fractory.

Estonian made

According to Vares, Fractory is an outgrowth of Estonia’s do-it-yourself mindset, and the company’s development is entwined with the country’s digital trajectory, which has led to the nickname e-Estonia. Digitisation was originally undertaken to save money and cut back on bureaucracy and paper waste. But people also accepted it because it made sense, he says.

“Estonians have always been makers,” says Vares. “Estonians are not conquerors, and we are not settlers,” he says. “We build our homes, maintain our homes, and build everything necessary for our homes. Sometimes, often, it happens that we come up with something brilliant that others also need.”

With Fractory, Vares and his cofounders developed a cloud-based manufacturing platform that connects engineering companies with the manufacturing market. Companies can upload their CAD files as either 2D drawings or 3D models, find the best fit for manufacturing partners using Fractory’s algorithm, order whatever parts they need, and have them delivered. The ordering data is standardized to make sure there are no delays and quality stays efficient.

“We provide quick access and the best solution on the market for customers,” says Vares. 

Creating the Fractory platform was no picnic. Vares says that the company needed to develop the technology to automate the selection process. “Dissecting the order information and connecting it to a manufacturer is pretty complicated,” he says. In addition to manufacturing technology, the platform, for example, includes elements of fintech and logistics. “We haven’t built one company, we’ve built five companies at the same time,” he says. “It’s been a massive process.”

A direct effect

Fractory’s online marketplace is not only aimed at engineers who need custom laser-cut parts. While they can use it to compare and fulfil orders, regardless of batch size, manufacturers that have specialised laser-cutting equipment can maximize the capacity they have to better capitalize on their cutting machines, which are often very expensive to acquire and to operate. Orders can run the gamut, from large-scale production to one-off prototypes, and Fractory has engineers on staff who can troubleshoot any issues that might arise in any part of the process. 

According to Vares, Fractory’s cofounder Rein Torm, a former software developer at Skype, was interested in the project because he could design a platform with actual physical output. The designs uploaded to Fractory’s site would eventually be produced and installed, as part of a ship or train, for example, or as a component of a CNG filling station somewhere.

“For him, the world has always been digital,” says Vares. “He was intrigued that he could build something digital that directly affects the physical world.”

It did take some years to win the market over, though. Vares acknowledges that Fractory at first struggled to win over first adopters. “It was not well received, but we were stubborn, and we knew that it made sense,” he says. “Six or seven years later, we now know the revolution we are bringing to the industry is inevitable,” he adds. “It was bound to happen anyway. We were lucky to get it started before it was obvious.”

Expansion

Fractory currently has about 80 employees across multiple locations, including an office in Turku, Finland, and another in Manchester, UK, where it opened a location in 2019. It also liaises with 164 active supply partners around the world, each one of which is vetted by the firm.

Its home market is Northern Europe, where growth continues in Estonia, with a population of 1.3 million. “Estonia has been growing immensely,” says Vares. “Manufacturing is everywhere,” he says. “The amount of metal that goes around the world is not something that people think of every day, but even in a small market like Estonia, the volumes are massive.” 

As they are in Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Sweden, where Fractory has expanded its supplier market. The UK has also proven a good market for the company, and via the UK, Fractory is also serving US customers. Indeed, about a tenth of UK orders are from US clients.

Interestingly, the last technology innovation in the metal manufacturing market might really have been email, says Vares. Three decades ago, customers would have to go to suppliers in person to place orders. Email eliminated the need to do that, but Fractory has changed the process. For users, Fractory offers a way to get the parts they need faster, so they can focus on their actual important tasks.

“At the end of the day, the customer wants the metal parts,” he says. “They want to make their product, and they want to sell whatever their product is. Procurement is a means to an end.”

Resouce: e-estonia

Unlocking AI’s potential in Estonia’s industrial landscape: a tale of challenges and opportunities

October 18, 2023

by Carmen Raal

In our fast-evolving industrial world, integrating AI has become a pivotal strategy for companies striving to maintain a competitive edge. When implemented effectively, AI ushers in a new era of efficiency and productivity across industrial processes. The advantages of AI adoption are diverse – from elevating productivity and enhancing quality control to enabling predictive maintenance and data-driven decision-making. Early AI adopters gain a competitive advantage and position themselves as industry trailblazers, poised to navigate the challenges and seize the opportunities of the modern industrial landscape.

The industrial sector is the largest segment of Estonia’s economy and plays a vital role in propelling economic growth. Industrial enterprises create many job opportunities and pave the way for various other forms of businesses to thrive.

Estonia is widely acclaimed for its digital innovations and flourishing startup ecosystem. Moreover, Estonia boasts the highest density of AI startups per million people. Despite this, somewhat surprisingly, Estonia has witnessed limited AI adoption within its industrial sector, with just 4% of companies incorporating AI last year.

Although, it has not been a problem-free year for industrial companies in Estonia. Statistics Estonia, noted that the decrease in industrial production has been a prevailing trend throughout the year. Notably, shale oil production was a rare exception, showing a significant increase of 22.0%. Among larger industries, output decreased in wood manufacturing (15.8%), electrical equipment (7.2%), fabricated metal products (8.1%), electronic products (18.9%), and food products (7.1%).

Given these concerning statistics, I came across a master’s thesis titled “Challenges Faced in Implementing AI in Estonian Manufacturing and Retail Companies” by Andrei Hirvi. Intrigued by the topic, I had the opportunity to sit down with him for an insightful conversation. Our discussion aimed to unravel companies’ key hurdles and explore potential solutions.

Primary challenges to implementing AI in industrial processes

When looking into what were the primary challenges that companies face when trying to implement AI/ML solutions, I see a lot of similarities with digital transformation projects in the public sector

The primary roadblock that emerged consistently was the lack of upper management support. Despite the internal initiatives, progress remained stagnant without backing from top-level executives. During his research, Andrei also noticed a common misconception among companies: many believed they lacked the necessary data to commence their AI journey. In reality, this often isn’t the true impediment. Lastly, it’s common for companies to overlook the importance of an end-to-end solution. Integrating AI with existing IT systems and clearly defining the end users often falls by the wayside.

A notable challenge specific to industrial companies in Estonia has been the absence of a data-driven mindset or data-driven work culture. This entails questions such as: Do we effectively utilize data? Are we actively collecting it? And how do we shape our decision-making processes around it?

A company has overcome challenges and is ready to innovate. Where to start?

  1. Top-down commitment: It must begin with a top-down commitment from the company’s leadership, a collective decision to invest in the initiative.
  2. Financial preparedness: Determine the extent of your financial readiness. Clearly define how much capital you’re willing to invest in the endeavour.
  3. In-house expertise vs. partnership: While possessing the full spectrum of in-house expertise is unnecessary, decide whether to bring in a dedicated in-house leader to spearhead the project or explore partnering with an external expert.

However, it is important to note out with the right work culture in place, innovation has the potential to spring from every member of the workforce.

How can the public sector support industrial companies?

While most companies find satisfaction in their innovative solutions, they often grapple with fears that require mitigation. Implementing AI represents a high-risk investment. States can play a pivotal role in risk reduction through various grant programs and mentoring initiatives. Additionally, Andrei has suggested that the state focuses on formulating a comprehensive strategy for employees displaced by AI. This challenge extends beyond the industrial sector, as future technological advancements will impact all of society.

While AI flourishes in startups, the industrial sector faces persistent challenges. These challenges resemble those found in public sector digital transformations: the absence of upper management support, misconceptions about data availability, and the oversight of comprehensive AI solutions. Amid these challenges and promising opportunities, embracing AI is a clear pathway to progress within Estonia’s industrial landscape. With a well-defined strategy and ample resources, transformation becomes an attainable goal.

The European Union has established a formidable goal: By 2030, 75% of European enterprises are expected to integrate cloud computing services, big data, and artificial intelligence into their operations. While this aspiration is commendable, it presents distinct challenges, particularly for countries with more modest economic footprints, such as Estonia and other smaller nations. The majority of enterprises in Estonia are Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs); in contrast to countries with more larger corporations that often possess the internal expertise or financial capacity to acquire such expertise through strategic partnerships readily,  SMEs do not enjoy the same advantages in this regard.

Resouce: e-estonia

Fresh report: Internet Freedom remained protected in Estonia 

October 4, 2023

Global internet freedom declined for the 13th consecutive year as conditions deteriorated in 29 countries and improved in 20 others, according to Freedom on the Net 2023: The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence. The report by Freedom House found that internet freedom in Estonia remained highly protected.

The report also found that Iran suffered the year’s worst score decline as authorities shut down internet services and blocked social media to stifle anti-government protests. In two record highs, people in at least 55 countries faced legal repercussions for expressing themselves online, and governments in 41 countries blocked websites hosting political, social, and religious speech. Both practices persisted in China, which retained its title as the world’s worst environment for internet freedom for the ninth consecutive year.

Estonia continues to hold the second position worldwide regarding internet freedom after Iceland. Although Estonia remains a front-runner in the index, the report emphasises developments that affect the state of internet freedom.

“Estonia, known for its good level of digital society, ensures the availability of network connection, and the country offers strong protection for users’ rights. The freedom of the digital environment to publish content is not limited, even during crises. Restrictions on online content and channels are related to preventing the spread of hostile propaganda and false information, as well as sanctions against Russian media channels,” is the summary of one of the Estonian reporters, Proud Engineers e-governance expert Hille Hinsberg.

Globally, internet freedom has declined for 13 years in a row. For example, the use of tracking tools and manipulation of online users through false information is constantly increasing. According to Hinsberg, “governments impose various restrictions on what billions of people can access and share online, whether it’s blocking foreign websites, tracking and collecting personal data, or increasing control over their own country’s technical infrastructure.”

The report also found that while advances in artificial intelligence (AI) benefit society, they have been used to increase the scale and efficiency of digital repression. Governments are leveraging automated systems to strengthen their information controls and hone forms of online censorship. Simultaneously, disinformation distributors have turned to AI tools to fabricate images, audio, and text, further blurring the lines between reality and deception.

The report calls on policymakers and their civic and private-sector partners to gain momentum in protecting overall internet freedom, especially as AI technology augments the forces driving the multiyear decline. An effective defence of internet freedom requires not just developing AI governance systems but also addressing long-standing threats to privacy, free expression, and access to information that have corroded the broader digital environment.

 Key findings for Estonia

  • Since the beginning of the Russian aggression in Ukraine, the Estonian Consumer Protection and Technical Supervision Agency (TTJA) has ordered communication companies to block media and online channels related to the Russian state to prevent the spread of war propaganda. Together with the applied sanctions, a total of 51 TV channels and nearly 200 websites have been banned in Estonia.
  • Facebook restricted access in Estonia to 163 items that violated EU sanctions on Russian state-controlled media sources between January and June 2022.
  • Following parliamentary elections in March 2023, the new coalition government drafted a proposal to implement stronger penalties for hate speech.

Key report findings

  • Global internet freedom declined for the 13th consecutive year. The environment for human rights online deteriorated in 29 countries, while only 20 countries registered net gains. The largest decline on the report’s 100-point scale occurred in Iran (−5), followed by the Philippines (−4) and then Belarus (−3), Costa Rica (−3), and Nicaragua (−3). For the ninth consecutive year, China was found to have the worst conditions for internet freedom, a title that Myanmar came close to capturing in this year’s report.
  • Attacks on free expression grew more common around the world. In a record 55 of the 70 countries covered by Freedom on the Net, people were imprisoned or otherwise persecuted for expressing their political, social, or religious viewpoints, while people were physically assaulted or killed for their online commentary in 41 countries. The most egregious cases occurred in Myanmar and Iran, whose authoritarian regimes carried out death sentences against people convicted of crimes related to online expression.
  • Generative AI threatens to supercharge online disinformation campaigns. Governments in at least 47 countries deployed commentators to manipulate online discussions in their favour during the coverage period, double the number from a decade ago. Meanwhile, AI-based tools that can fabricate text, audio, and imagery have quickly grown more sophisticated, accessible, and easy to use, spurring a concerning escalation of the associated disinformation tactics. Over the past year, the new technology was utilised in at least 16 countries to sow doubt, smear opponents, or influence public debate.
  • AI has allowed governments to enhance and refine their online censorship. The world’s most technically advanced authoritarian governments have responded to innovations in AI chatbot technology, attempting to ensure that the applications comply with or strengthen their censorship systems. Legal frameworks in at least 22 countries mandate that digital platforms deploy machine learning to remove disfavoured political, social, and religious speech. AI, however, has not completely displaced older methods of information control. Governments in a record 41 countries blocked websites with content that should be protected under free expression standards within international human rights law.
  • To protect internet freedom, democracy’s supporters must adapt the lessons learned from past internet policy challenges and apply them to AI. Democracies’ overreliance on self-regulation by private companies has left people’s rights exposed to a variety of threats in the digital age, and a shrinking of resources in the tech sector could exacerbate the deficiency. To protect the free and open internet, democratic policymakers—working side by side with civil society experts worldwide—should establish strong, human rights–based standards for both state and non-state actors that develop or deploy AI tools, including robust transparency and independent oversight.

The report identifies steps that policymakers, regulators, and tech companies can take to foster internet freedom. Click here to read the full report and policy recommendations.

Freedom on the Net is an annual study of human rights in the digital sphere. The project assesses internet freedom in 70 countries, accounting for 88 percent of the world’s internet users. This report, the 13th in its series, covered developments between June 2022 and May 2023. More than 85 analysts and advisers contributed to this year’s edition, using a standard methodology to determine each country’s internet freedom score on a 100-point scale, with 21 separate indicators pertaining to obstacles to access, limits on content, and violations of user rights. The Estonian report can be found here.

Freedom House is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organisation that works to create a world where all are free. We inform the world about threats to freedom, mobilise global action, and support democracy’s defenders.

Resouce: e-estonia

6 lessons in building a digital society

October 2, 2023

by Justin Petrone

Around the world, Estonia is still often seen as something of an innovative newcomer. But when it comes to digitisation, the country is quickly becoming the grandfather or grandmother of digital nations. With over 20 years of experience, Estonia has stories to tell about the lessons it has learned. 

This was also apparent during a panel discussion, “Building Resilient and Effective Digital Societies: Lessons and Opportunities”, at the recent Tallinn Digital Summit. Florian Marcus, a project manager at Proud Engineers, moderated the panel, which also included Proud Engineers CEO Laura KaskAve Lauringson, managing director of the e-Estonia Briefing Centre; Ants Sild, chairman of the Baltic Computer System (BCS) Digital Skills Academy; and Toomas Hendrik Ilves, who served as president of the Republic of Estonia from 2006 to 2016.

1. Offer digital skills to everyone

The topics discussed by the panel were varied and wide-ranging. Still, when asked about the lessons Estonia had learned from its early embrace of digitisation, dating back to the dawn of the online era in the 1990s, a consensus emerged that building a digital society required more than investing in equipment or software. Rather, public outreach was needed to educate citizens about using new technologies, improve their digital skills, and change their mindset.

According to Ants Sild, digital skills have been one source of Estonia’s success in creating a digital society. He said that the state began cultivating digital skills long before it began to transfer its services online seriously. “These were not just IT and technology skills, but more societal skills,” he said. Ilves, who was one of the initiators of the Tiger Leap Program in Estonia in the mid-1990s, agreed. Tiger Leap was an effort to modernise the country’s educational system, focusing on making computers accessible to all students, as well as connectivity to the internet, alongside teacher training and providing new courses in Estonian.

“At that time, the idea was just to get the digital skills out,” Ilves said. He said that the focus was on investing in education and infrastructure for the first few years, including understanding digitisation and coding. It wasn’t until 2000 that the X-Road data exchange layer was introduced, creating the backbone for an ever-expanding ecosystem of digital services.

2. Make it mandatory

Here, Ilves underscored that Estonia created a mandatory digital identity for all residents, a step he called “key to developing a digital society.” He said that digitisation efforts had failed to coalesce in countries where such identities were optional, as people weren’t motivated to use an optional identity. Governments were similarly not motivated to create digital services.

“You have to make it mandatory for it to be successful,” Ilves said. 

Estonia has borrowed ideas from other countries, too, though. Proud Engineers’ Laura Kask said that the idea to create a digital identity actually came from Finland, where non-mandatory electronic identity cards were introduced in 1999, three years before Estonia.

“The idea came from Finland, and we incorporated our ideas on top of it, tested it, made it compulsory, and now almost 99 per cent of the [Estonian] population uses it,” Kask said.

3. The need for political will

Other factors enabled Estonia’s digital transition. Ilves said that governments must be committed to undertaking reforms that may outlast current administrations. “You need to have the political will to do it,” Ilves said. “Too many countries think that digitisation is about buying stuff,” he said. It requires, he insisted, “knowledge and commitment on the part of political leadership.” The legal framework also has to be solid.

“Laws are the software of society,” commented Ilves. He said that Estonia would not have been able to achieve what it has had it not adopted the Digital Signature Act, enacted in 2000. “If you want to change society, you have to change some of that software, too,” he said. 

Private sector adoption has also spurred on change. Sild agreed that private investments from the banking and telecommunications sectors had played significant roles in digitisation, with almost no government support or engagement at all.

4. Exchange ideas with other governments

However, the creation of a digital society in Estonia has not only been solely a success story. The panellist said there are opportunities to innovate. Proud Engineers’ Kask said that Estonia should continue interacting with other countries to share ideas and learn about new concepts.

“It’s important to exchange ideas, to talk to each other and with government officials worldwide,” said Kask.

According to Lauringson, who directs the e-Estonia Briefing Centre, about 90,000 people have visited to learn more about Estonia’s digitisation efforts. “e-Estonia is the best-known brand of Estonia,” she said, adding that the impact of digitisation on both the government and private sector in the country has been “huge and difficult to measure.” Visitors are mostly interested in how Estonian e-governance works. “The fancy show about the ID card doesn’t give them much,” said Lauringson. “They want to see how the system is built and how we e-govern.”

5. Don’t expect quick success

Lauringson has told them not to expect quick success and said that within Estonia, more could be done to improve the skills of state employees. “We have done well in engaging Estonian citizens in the digital society but have not focused on our government people,” she said. Last year, Estonia rolled out a Digital Competence Initiative. As part of the initiative, courses in digitisation have been offered to state employees through the country’s e-Governance Academy.

“For 20 years, we have been engaging society but haven’t paid attention to high-level officials,” Lauringson said. “They are still a target group.”

6. Being a digital native requires a revolution in thought

Regarding educational outreach, Ilves has been heavily involved with creating a master’s program in digital administration at the University of Tartu, where he has given lectures. Ilves said that the program is intended for senior civil servants to understand the nature of transitioning to e-governance, and is geared especially toward students from developing countries. Ilves noted that digitisation has also entered an era where it is no longer focused on moving paper documents online but rethinking how to build services without a link to legacy systems. He called this perspective being a digital native and said it will require “a revolution in thought.”

Recorse: e-estonia